Star Trek = big government

It’s recently come out that Stephen Harper likes Star Trek [ej] and in fact is a huge fan of the original show. Some people are even saying he should start using his geek factor in ads [ws]

Again — where are the ads? Doesn’t the nerd vote matter? I know a lot of males who live in their parents’ basement and never have sex (with others, I mean), who would be thrilled to hear this about Harper.

My friend Don Iveson [di] has a wonderful commentary about how he’s aghast to learn that Harper likes Trek, since as a big Trek fan himself he was always more inclined to believe that left-wingers loved the Trek and right-wingers loved the Star Wars [di].

After all, Star Wars at its essence is about the triumph of the rugged individual over tremendous repression imposed by an evil big government. You can easily imagine Darth Vader siphoning off sponsorship funds destined to prop up the Empire’s tarnished brand on some secessionist planet; it has Jedi Harper written all over it.

Meanwhile, in brilliant contrast, Gene Roddenberry et al. imagined an egalitarian society administered by a peaceful interplanetary democracy, a society where each individual — freed from want — can fulfill their potential; not exactly the stuff of your usual Conservative stump speech.

Apparently he’s none too keen on Star Trek: The Next Generation which is understandable. I mean you’ve got Picard lusting after his dead friend’s hot MILF wife, Crusher’s hot girl on trill girl kiss, Wesley’s droppping out of military school to become some sort of magic intergalactic hippie and the sex planet of Risa where family values is a position not a platform.

2 Comments so far

  1. Fen (unregistered) on January 15th, 2006 @ 12:58 pm

    I wish we had a sex planet. Not that I could get laid there either.

  2. Ryan C (unregistered) on January 15th, 2006 @ 4:19 pm

    I doubt I should take this post seriously, but some sort of nerd pheremone is clearly at work (must resist! Worse than pon far!) and I must reply.

    1) Harper, like fans of Ezra Pound, is clearly able to separate considerations of aesthetics from the implicit politics in a work of, erm, art.

    2) Star Trek’s great art is to depict a utopia: the politics of the Federation is essentially corruption-free, and all citizens are assumed to have good health and full bellies. Hey, if health care was so cheap as to be providable free for all, it would be a very different world than we live in, one even Mr. Harper could enjoy.

    3) Star Wars is not very interested in policy. Rebels brave and dedicated, Empire totalitarian and twisted by evil Sith values, release the Jedi. in Star Trek, every “Prime Directive” episode (which was what, half of them?) is essentially a discussion of policy. The other episodes revolve around encounters with super-genius aliens, or encounters with super-sexy aliens, and we can all support those things, regardless of politics.


Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Content: Creative Commons | Site and Design © 2008 | Metroblogging ® and Metblogs ® are registered trademarks of Bode Media, Inc.