Laying down the law last week, a pollster called me up to ask how I would rate police services in Vancouver. I’m not really sure why I agreed to do it. Usually I just give them an excuse and hang up. This time, I took a few minutes to hear the questions.

I was a little upset that most of the questions lacked any nuance: for example, one question was whether I thought crime was increasing. Well, violent crime? Property crime? Aggressive panhandling? Lumping it all in together doesn’t seem to make sense.

Then there was a question near the end – would I be willing to pay an extra $100 on my taxes to support an increase in police services? That depends – what is the money going to pay for – more cops on the streets, or just higher salaries and new police cars? There was no context.

I ended up not answering about a third of the questions and answering a third that I probably shouldn’t have, since they were open to interpretation. The other third – well, I guess things like my postal code aren’t so ambiguous.

The poll was clearly done to see whether the city would have the public’s support for a rise in the cost of policing (possibly independent of a rise in actual policing capacity).

The downtown core has seen a huge population increase from the construction of high-rise condos and the transformation of Granville into a true entertainment centre – without a corresponding rise in the numbers of cops on the street. We’ll see if that changes.

Note: The photograph that accompanies this article was taken by me on a cell phone on my lunch break. It’s the first time I’ve managed to catch an arrest on camera, but far from the first arrest I’ve witnessed on Granville.

Comments are closed.

Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Content: Creative Commons | Site and Design © 2009 | Metroblogging ® and Metblogs ® are registered trademarks of Bode Media, Inc.