<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Face Lift for Bridge of Death</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vancouver.metblogs.com/2006/12/28/face-lift-for-bridge-of-death/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vancouver.metblogs.com/2006/12/28/face-lift-for-bridge-of-death/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:54:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: maikopunk</title>
		<link>http://vancouver.metblogs.com/2006/12/28/face-lift-for-bridge-of-death/comment-page-1/#comment-2076</link>
		<dc:creator>maikopunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouver.metblogs.com/2006/12/28/face-lift-for-bridge-of-death/#comment-2076</guid>
		<description>The sheets of plywood covering up the spots where accidents have taken out the railings really make the bridge something special. Love that abandoned house/grow-op aesthetic. 

Would anyone really miss the Pattullo if it was torn down? They could replace it with a new bridge, or better yet, use the money to expand rapid transit into Surrey. Probably there will be some who argue it&#039;s a heritage structure and needs to be preserved/restored whatever. But &quot;old&quot; does not equal &quot;heritage.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sheets of plywood covering up the spots where accidents have taken out the railings really make the bridge something special. Love that abandoned house/grow-op aesthetic. </p>
<p>Would anyone really miss the Pattullo if it was torn down? They could replace it with a new bridge, or better yet, use the money to expand rapid transit into Surrey. Probably there will be some who argue it&#8217;s a heritage structure and needs to be preserved/restored whatever. But &#8220;old&#8221; does not equal &#8220;heritage.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathon Narvey</title>
		<link>http://vancouver.metblogs.com/2006/12/28/face-lift-for-bridge-of-death/comment-page-1/#comment-2075</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon Narvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouver.metblogs.com/2006/12/28/face-lift-for-bridge-of-death/#comment-2075</guid>
		<description>Bridge of Death, eh? Any film publicist people out there? I&#039;ve got an idea...

Seriously, though, this sounds pretty scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bridge of Death, eh? Any film publicist people out there? I&#8217;ve got an idea&#8230;</p>
<p>Seriously, though, this sounds pretty scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
